Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	2.20
6	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	6	1.20	15	.400	0.0	4.65
9	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	1	0.33	7	.143	1.0	4.63
10	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	4	0.80	6	.667	0.0	5.50
15	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	.200	0.0	4.40
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.40
21	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	3.13
25	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	3.10
31	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	14	.571	0.0	5.43
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	.714	0.0	4.10
41	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	13	.538	0.0	4.10
Total		43	.	.	.	.	.	14	1	5	0.02	40	.875	42	0.98	93	.452	1.0	4.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	1.87	30	3	.900	0.0	2.20
6	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	10	1.97	30	2	.933	0.0	4.65
9	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	1.91	23	2	.913	1.0	4.63
10	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	19	2.07	42	5	.881	0.0	5.50
15	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.21	14	1	.929	0.0	4.40
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	14	2.00	29	5	.828	0.0	4.40
21	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.14	21	2	.905	0.0	3.13
25	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	15	1.79	33	8	.758	0.0	3.10
31	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	16	2.10	41	2	.951	0.0	5.43
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.09	22	1	.955	0.0	4.10
41	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	10	2.17	24	0	1.000	0.0	4.10
Total		43	.	.	.	.	.	75	1.74	130	2.02	309	31	.900	1.0	4.15