Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	4.25
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	6.20
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	3.73
7	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	.455	0.0	4.10
9	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	6.08
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	2	0.40	11	.818	4	0.80	7	.571	2.0	5.10
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	5	1.67	7	.714	1.0	6.23
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	2	0.25	18	.889	4	1.00	11	.364	1.0	6.53
14	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	3	1	0.60	21	.952	5	1.00	15	.333	3.0	4.40
17	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	6	.833	4	1.33	6	.667	1.0	5.96
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.95
26	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3	1	1.00	16	.938	0	0.00	4	.000	3.0	8.02
29	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	4	0.25	15	.733	2	0.50	4	.500	1.0	4.15
31	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	1	0.50	15	.933	7	1.75	13	.538	2.0	6.92
44	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	6.28
Total		56	.	.	.	.	.	57	15	18	0.27	156	.885	55	0.98	112	.491	15.0	5.53

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	21	2.18	38	3	.921	0.0	4.25
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.21	24	3	.875	1.0	6.20
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.24	25	1	.960	0.0	3.73
7	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	15	1.97	32	5	.844	0.0	4.10
9	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	2.69	16	0	1.000	0.0	6.08
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	13	2.00	32	3	.906	2.0	5.10
12	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	16	2.14	29	3	.897	1.0	6.23
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	14	2.35	23	1	.957	1.0	6.53
14	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	18	2.11	38	3	.921	3.0	4.40
17	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	1.94	17	1	.941	1.0	5.96
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	1.87	23	3	.870	0.0	4.95
26	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	9	2.20	15	1	.933	3.0	8.02
29	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	4	1.83	12	2	.833	1.0	4.15
31	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	2.47	19	0	1.000	2.0	6.92
44	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	17	2.46	26	1	.962	0.0	6.28
Total		56	.	.	.	.	.	89	1.59	190	2.17	369	30	.919	15.0	5.53