Players

Hunter McCormack 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
18	16	-	-	14	14

Season 10 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
172 6th	2.22 70th	.949 35th	85 83rd	40 11th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	5	2	1.25	27	.926	6	1.50	9	.667	5.0	9.41
3	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	2	0.67	8	.250	0.0	7.80
5	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	9.69
6	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	3.60
7	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	1	0.50	13	.923	5	1.25	8	.625	2.0	5.33
8	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	4	1.00	6	.667	0.0	8.58
11	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	7	0	2.33	19	1.000	4	1.33	5	.800	7.0	8.04
12	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	0	0.50	16	1.000	2	0.50	5	.400	2.0	7.00
13	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	4	2	0.80	22	.909	3	0.60	6	.500	4.0	5.65
16	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.25	15	.933	4	1.00	5	.800	1.0	5.88
17	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	4	0.25	15	.733	7	1.75	10	.700	1.0	6.37
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	5.78
25	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	1	0.50	15	.933	2	0.50	5	.400	2.0	6.71
26	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	14	.929	3	0.75	11	.273	0.0	5.15
30	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	3	0.33	13	.769	5	1.67	6	.833	1.0	8.29
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	8.11
35	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2	2	0.40	24	.917	6	1.20	7	.857	2.0	5.88
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.25	17	.882	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	6.18
39	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	4	3	1.00	20	.850	2	0.50	3	.667	4.0	4.36
40	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	2	0.25	21	.905	6	1.50	12	.500	1.0	4.11
44	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	5	1.67	7	.714	2.0	8.26
45	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	3	0	0.60	16	1.000	5	1.00	7	.714	3.0	4.80
Total		83	.	.	.	.	.	143	40	42	0.48	343	.878	85	1.02	146	.582	40.0	6.59

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	15	2.60	20	1	.950	5.0	9.41
3	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	11	2.13	24	1	.958	0.0	7.80
5	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	8	2.40	15	0	1.000	1.0	9.69
6	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	2.13	16	0	1.000	0.0	3.60
7	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	5	2.08	13	0	1.000	2.0	5.33
8	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	11	2.11	28	1	.964	0.0	8.58
11	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.80	10	0	1.000	7.0	8.04
12	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	21	2.38	37	1	.973	2.0	7.00
13	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	22	2.17	42	3	.929	4.0	5.65
16	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	13	2.45	22	0	1.000	1.0	5.88
17	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	15	2.27	30	1	.967	1.0	6.37
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.10	20	0	1.000	1.0	5.78
25	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	11	2.24	25	0	1.000	2.0	6.71
26	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	1.86	36	2	.944	0.0	5.15
30	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.53	17	0	1.000	1.0	8.29
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	17	2.26	31	2	.935	0.0	8.11
35	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	22	2.00	45	6	.867	2.0	5.88
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	19	2.20	40	2	.950	1.0	6.18
39	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.08	26	2	.923	4.0	4.36
40	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	28	2.29	45	5	.889	1.0	4.11
44	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.55	20	0	1.000	2.0	8.26
45	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	17	2.10	41	4	.902	3.0	4.80
Total		83	.	.	.	.	.	172	2.07	302	2.22	603	31	.949	40.0	6.59