Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	7	.286	3	1	7	0.20	14	.500	35	7.00	102	.343	4.5	3.34
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	11	3.67	53	.208	0.5	2.38
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	7	-.143	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	19	6.33	51	.373	2.5	3.06
10	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	29	9.67	69	.420	1.0	4.16
17	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	8	.000	2	0	4	0.00	12	.667	41	10.25	86	.477	2.0	4.50
21	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	27	9.00	64	.422	0.0	3.92
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	9	0	2	0.00	19	.895	38	12.67	72	.528	1.5	9.45
29	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	4	1	3	0.33	12	.750	21	7.00	61	.344	2.5	3.18
41	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	2	0	1	0.00	13	.923	30	7.50	82	.366	2.0	3.60
46	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	12	4	3	0.80	24	.875	44	8.80	93	.473	7.0	5.24
Total		36	9	0.25	9	49	.000	48	8	27	0.22	137	.803	295	8.19	733	.402	23.5	4.28

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.34
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.38
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.06
10	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.16
17	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.50
21	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.92
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	9.45
29	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.18
41	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.60
46	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.24
Total		36	0	13	13	2	0.36	35	0.97	.	.	.	.	.	23.5	4.28