Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	7	.000	4	2	5	0.67	11	.545	31	10.33	53	.585	5.0	6.03
2	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	0	0	4	0.00	10	.600	40	10.00	83	.482	3.5	4.26
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	7	2	1	0.40	18	.944	52	10.40	106	.491	3.0	5.46
12	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	9	1	1	0.20	22	.955	63	12.60	96	.656	3.0	8.07
13	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	28	9.33	52	.538	4.5	5.46
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	1	1	0.33	13	.923	35	11.67	71	.493	2.5	7.07
17	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	3	.333	7	2	2	0.67	15	.867	36	12.00	60	.600	5.5	7.91
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	7	3	2	1.00	13	.846	30	10.00	67	.448	4.5	5.94
21	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	35	11.67	62	.565	2.0	5.56
29	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	5	1	2	0.20	20	.900	57	11.40	95	.600	4.0	6.43
Total		37	14	0.38	9	45	.111	48	14	20	0.38	141	.858	407	11.00	745	.546	37.5	6.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.03
2	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.26
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.46
12	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.07
13	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.46
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.07
17	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.91
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.94
21	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.56
29	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.43
Total		37	2	15	17	2	0.46	27	0.73	.	.	.	.	.	37.5	6.22