Players

Matthew Mitchell 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	10	14	10	3

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	10	24	-.167	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	29	.517	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.95
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	15	.000	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.45
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	20	.400	7	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.96
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	15	.533	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	4.91
13	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	21	.143	4	1	1	0.20	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.32
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	7	28	.214	3	0	3	0.00	13	.769	1	0.20	1	1.000	13.5	4.91
17	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	21	.286	9	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.19
18	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	21	.381	9	1	2	0.33	16	.875	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.99
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	5	25	.360	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.47
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	18	.556	5	1	5	0.33	13	.615	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.62
36	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	5	31	.387	4	2	2	0.50	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	8.33
41	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	17	.176	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.08
Total		47	146	3.11	62	285	.295	63	8	26	0.17	167	.844	1	0.02	3	.333	168.0	6.04

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	14	2.22	32	0	1.000	7.5	4.32
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	9	2.10	21	1	.952	19.0	7.95
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	7	1.79	19	2	.895	5.5	2.45
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	22	2.51	35	0	1.000	13.5	6.96
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	11	1.74	31	7	.774	12.5	4.91
13	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	1	0.20	19	2.14	36	4	.889	10.5	3.32
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	21	2.17	41	3	.927	13.5	4.91
17	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	4	1.61	18	1	.944	11.5	6.19
18	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	15	2.13	23	5	.783	14.0	7.99
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	9	2.13	16	2	.875	17.0	8.47
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	7	1.70	20	4	.800	13.5	6.62
36	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	10	2.50	13	2.18	28	1	.964	20.5	8.33
41	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	16	2.29	24	3	.875	9.5	6.08
Total		47	0	28	28	3	0.60	56	1.19	167	2.09	344	33	.904	168.0	6.04