Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	4.68
2	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	3	0.60	6	.500	0.0	3.70
4	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.25	12	.833	6	1.50	8	.750	1.0	3.51
5	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	1.0	6.80
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.85
8	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	1	0.25	17	.941	4	1.00	4	1.000	1.0	5.80
10	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.20	11	.818	3	0.60	5	.600	1.0	5.45
11	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	4	1.33	8	.500	1.0	3.03
14	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.50	10	.900	4	1.00	9	.444	2.0	6.78
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	3	1	0.75	15	.933	3	0.75	8	.375	3.0	6.20
26	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	4	2	1.33	11	.818	4	1.33	4	1.000	4.0	7.68
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	3	0.33	7	.571	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	7.30
35	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.50	17	.941	5	1.25	7	.714	2.0	8.21
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	6	2.00	9	.667	0.0	5.81
44	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	1	0.50	14	.929	4	1.00	4	1.000	2.0	5.75
Total		55	.	.	.	.	.	61	19	20	0.35	167	.880	53	0.96	83	.639	19.0	5.70

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	1.85	20	4	.800	0.0	4.68
2	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	17	2.19	32	3	.906	0.0	3.70
4	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	9	1.95	22	3	.864	1.0	3.51
5	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.50	20	0	1.000	1.0	6.80
7	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	1.91	23	3	.870	0.0	4.85
8	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	2.00	34	4	.882	1.0	5.80
10	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	1.97	30	1	.967	1.0	5.45
11	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	1.89	28	5	.821	1.0	3.03
14	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	11	2.56	16	1	.938	2.0	6.78
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	2.22	18	1	.944	3.0	6.20
26	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.43	14	0	1.000	4.0	7.68
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.42	19	0	1.000	1.0	7.30
35	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	12	2.63	16	0	1.000	2.0	8.21
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.05	21	3	.857	0.0	5.81
44	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	14	2.03	31	3	.903	2.0	5.75
Total		55	.	.	.	.	.	88	1.60	166	2.13	344	31	.910	19.0	5.70