Players

Howard Hamlin 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	18	-	-	17	11

Season 11 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
202 2nd	2.45 4th	.968 8th	89 76th	39 16th

Career Honors

S111st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S123rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	0.0	9.36
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	7.56
7	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	3	0	0.75	16	1.000	3	0.75	6	.500	3.0	10.00
8	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	7	1.40	8	.875	0.0	8.68
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	6	1.50	9	.667	0.0	8.60
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	2	0.67	11	.818	5	1.67	8	.625	2.0	7.81
14	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	7	2	1.75	23	.913	5	1.25	10	.500	7.0	8.00
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.50	16	.875	6	1.50	6	1.000	2.0	6.52
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	8.78
20	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	4	1	1.33	15	.933	3	1.00	5	.600	4.0	7.65
22	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	3	0.25	13	.769	4	1.00	5	.800	1.0	7.13
24	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	4	4	0.80	18	.778	6	1.20	7	.857	4.0	6.15
27	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.20	14	.929	2	0.40	4	.500	1.0	7.15
28	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	4	3	0.80	20	.850	7	1.40	10	.700	4.0	7.43
30	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	1	0.50	15	.933	1	0.25	1	1.000	2.0	8.40
32	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	1	0.40	20	.950	4	0.80	8	.500	2.0	6.05
34	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	7.68
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	3	0.33	10	.700	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	7.90
39	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	2	0.75	22	.909	7	1.75	8	.875	3.0	6.68
40	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	2	0.67	2	1.000	1.0	8.63
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	16	.938	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	7.96
45	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	1	0.50	15	.933	3	0.75	4	.750	2.0	6.05
Total		85	.	.	.	.	.	114	39	33	0.46	323	.898	89	1.05	125	.712	39.0	7.74

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	2.78	9	0	1.000	0.0	9.36
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	12	2.47	17	2	.882	0.0	7.56
7	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	18	4.50	8	2.50	12	1	.917	3.0	10.00
8	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	13	2.76	17	0	1.000	0.0	8.68
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	11	2.45	20	0	1.000	0.0	8.60
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.44	16	0	1.000	2.0	7.81
14	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	9	2.38	13	1	.923	7.0	8.00
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	6	2.40	10	0	1.000	2.0	6.52
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	4	2.25	8	0	1.000	0.0	8.78
20	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.44	16	1	.938	4.0	7.65
22	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	6	2.29	14	0	1.000	1.0	7.13
24	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	9	2.22	18	2	.889	4.0	6.15
27	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	15	2.42	24	0	1.000	1.0	7.15
28	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	9	2.40	15	0	1.000	4.0	7.43
30	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	13	2.38	24	1	.958	2.0	8.40
32	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	12	2.32	22	1	.955	2.0	6.05
34	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.78	9	0	1.000	0.0	7.68
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.50	16	0	1.000	1.0	7.90
39	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	2.46	24	1	.958	3.0	6.68
40	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.73	11	0	1.000	1.0	8.63
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	12	2.65	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.96
45	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	8	2.19	16	1	.938	2.0	6.05
Total		85	.	.	.	.	.	202	2.38	215	2.45	348	11	.968	39.0	7.74