Players

Howard Hamlin 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	18	-	-	17	11

Season 12 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
164 10th	2.51 2nd	.978 2nd	84 81st	32 34th

Career Honors

S111st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S123rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	4	1	0.80	18	.944	3	0.60	8	.375	4.0	8.32
6	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	8	1.60	12	.667	0.0	8.35
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	2	0.60	21	.905	2	0.40	5	.400	3.0	7.96
9	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	1	0.33	14	.929	2	0.67	2	1.000	1.0	10.00
10	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	5.91
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	0	0.33	16	1.000	5	1.67	9	.556	1.0	7.15
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.33	14	.786	5	1.67	7	.714	1.0	10.00
16	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	4	1.00	10	.400	0.0	5.73
18	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	4	0	1.33	14	1.000	2	0.67	4	.500	4.0	4.85
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	8.66
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.40	19	.895	4	0.80	6	.667	2.0	5.38
23	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	4	0.25	15	.733	7	1.75	9	.778	1.0	6.47
26	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	3	0.40	20	.850	4	0.80	7	.571	2.0	8.49
27	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	0	0.50	17	1.000	1	0.25	3	.333	2.0	6.18
29	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.20	15	1.000	4	0.80	5	.800	1.0	7.51
32	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	5.65
35	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	4	4	0.80	25	.840	5	1.00	6	.833	4.0	5.85
37	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	5.85
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	4	2	1.00	19	.895	4	1.00	7	.571	4.0	7.76
40	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.50	11	.909	6	1.50	7	.857	2.0	9.37
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	8.39
45	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	2	0.50	4	.500	0.0	6.71
Total		87	.	.	.	.	.	113	32	32	0.37	313	.898	84	0.97	132	.636	32.0	7.30

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	13	2.61	18	0	1.000	4.0	8.32
6	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	11	2.59	17	0	1.000	0.0	8.35
7	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	12	2.53	17	0	1.000	3.0	7.96
9	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	7	2.60	10	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
10	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	15	2.52	21	0	1.000	0.0	5.91
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	2.83	6	0	1.000	1.0	7.15
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	9	2.57	14	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
16	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	16	2.55	22	1	.955	0.0	5.73
18	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.38	16	1	.938	4.0	4.85
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	6	2.33	12	0	1.000	0.0	8.66
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	2.35	20	1	.950	2.0	5.38
23	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	14	2.67	21	0	1.000	1.0	6.47
26	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	21	2.63	30	0	1.000	2.0	8.49
27	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.39	18	1	.944	2.0	6.18
29	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	14	2.52	23	0	1.000	1.0	7.51
32	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	2	2.00	4	0	1.000	0.0	5.65
35	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	11	2.32	19	1	.947	4.0	5.85
37	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.28	18	1	.944	0.0	5.85
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	13	2.65	17	1	.941	4.0	7.76
40	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	15	2.74	19	0	1.000	2.0	9.37
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.64	11	0	1.000	0.0	8.39
45	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	7	2.14	14	1	.929	0.0	6.71
Total		87	.	.	.	.	.	164	1.89	242	2.51	367	8	.978	32.0	7.30