Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 8 hours and 48 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 09:11:07 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Howard Hamlin 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	18	-	-	17	11

Season 9 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
104 45th	2.20 77th	.926 95th	53 105th	6 301st

Career Honors

S111st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S123rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	1	0	0.33	19	1.000	4	1.33	10	.400	1.0	7.31
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	5.00
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	5.75
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.20	10	.900	7	1.40	10	.700	1.0	6.45
16	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	4.71
18	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	5.66
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	7.63
21	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	5	.400	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	7.61
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	4	0.20	16	.750	3	0.60	4	.750	1.0	4.15
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	2	0.50	18	.889	4	1.00	6	.667	2.0	3.97
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	6	2.00	7	.857	0.0	5.36
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	4.05
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	4.40
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	4	0.00	12	.667	5	1.00	8	.625	0.0	4.05
45	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	7.66
Total		52	.	.	.	.	.	40	6	17	0.12	111	.847	53	1.02	84	.631	6.0	5.58

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	7	2.23	13	1	.923	1.0	7.31
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.00	15	1	.933	0.0	5.00
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.25	16	1	.938	0.0	5.75
15	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	15	2.30	27	1	.963	1.0	6.45
16	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.48	21	1	.952	0.0	4.71
18	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	11	1.85	33	3	.909	0.0	5.66
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	6	2.25	12	1	.917	0.0	7.63
21	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	4	2.30	10	0	1.000	0.0	7.61
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	16	2.19	32	3	.906	1.0	4.15
25	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	17	2.24	29	2	.931	2.0	3.97
26	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.32	22	1	.955	0.0	5.36
29	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.07	14	1	.929	0.0	4.05
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.10	20	2	.900	0.0	4.40
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	15	2.25	32	3	.906	0.0	4.05
45	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.31	13	2	.846	1.0	7.66
Total		52	.	.	.	.	.	104	2.00	156	2.20	309	23	.926	6.0	5.58