Players

Micah Stephens 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	-	14	12	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	7	23	.130	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.40
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	13	.077	4	1	4	0.33	10	.600	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.21
5	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	8	.375	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.10
8	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	19	.000	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.27
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	6	.500	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.65
13	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	12	.333	10	2	3	0.50	22	.864	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.43
15	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	13	.231	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.45
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	0	10	.600	4	1	4	0.25	12	.667	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.38
18	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	5	.000	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.21
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	16	.375	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.61
26	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	9	.222	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.18
29	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	11	.182	6	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.94
34	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	10	.100	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.30
39	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	16	.375	7	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.73
41	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	10	.500	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.24
44	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	14	.143	5	3	2	0.60	13	.846	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.08
46	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	11	.000	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.95
Total		59	97	1.64	50	206	.228	64	14	26	0.24	189	.862	.	.	.	.	138.0	5.65

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.40
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.21
5	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.10
8	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.27
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.65
13	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.43
15	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	1	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.45
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.38
18	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.21
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.61
26	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	2	5	7	0	2.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.18
29	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.94
34	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.30
39	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	2	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.73
41	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	2	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.24
44	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.08
46	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.95
Total		59	3	48	51	10	0.86	27	0.46	.	.	.	.	.	138.0	5.65