Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	3	1.000	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	28	9.33	61	.459	4.0	5.65
2	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	33	11.00	50	.660	3.0	6.98
3	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	6	.333	2	0	1	0.00	14	.929	51	12.75	87	.586	2.5	7.34
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	8	4	1	1.33	17	.941	35	11.67	49	.714	8.0	8.67
14	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	3	1	1	0.25	15	.933	44	11.00	82	.537	5.0	5.84
16	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	9	2	2	0.50	20	.900	58	14.50	79	.734	6.0	9.44
Total		21	15	0.71	1	26	.538	27	7	6	0.33	85	.929	249	11.86	408	.610	28.5	7.32

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.65
2	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.98
3	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.34
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.67
14	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.84
16	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.44
Total		21	0	13	13	1	0.62	25	1.19	.	.	.	.	.	28.5	7.32