Players

Brandon Johnson 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	15	14	6	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	3	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	9.17
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.62
7	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	14	.714	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.88
9	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	24	.250	2	1	4	0.20	14	.714	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.89
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	21	.476	7	3	3	0.60	21	.857	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.63
12	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.62
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	22	.500	6	2	4	0.40	17	.765	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.74
16	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.02
17	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	10	.400	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.26
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	15	.533	5	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.80
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	13	.615	4	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.47
26	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	14	.214	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.01
32	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	4	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.11
40	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	15	.400	13	3	2	0.60	26	.923	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.17
44	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	11	.545	10	3	1	0.60	19	.947	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.27
45	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	0	14	.857	9	1	5	0.25	18	.722	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.71
Total		61	149	2.44	42	219	.489	81	17	29	0.28	211	.863	.	.	.	.	197.0	7.34

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	1	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	9.17
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.62
7	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.88
9	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.89
11	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	2	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.63
12	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.62
15	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.74
16	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	9.02
17	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.26
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.80
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.47
26	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.01
32	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.11
40	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.17
44	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.27
45	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.71
Total		61	1	60	61	7	1.00	15	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	197.0	7.34