Players

Phillip Duffy 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	11	11	18

Season 12 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,196 1st	29 332nd	41 7th	84 88th	55 98th

Career Honors

S12Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	8	1	4	0.33	17	.765	45	15.00	65	.692	2.0	9.36
2	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	6	2	2	0.50	17	.882	53	13.25	90	.589	6.0	9.42
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	1	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	41	13.67	54	.759	1.5	7.66
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	6	3	0	1.00	13	1.000	41	13.67	62	.661	6.0	9.25
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	7	2	2	0.67	13	.846	42	14.00	53	.792	3.5	9.82
8	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	3	.000	7	1	3	0.25	18	.833	53	13.25	78	.679	4.0	9.35
10	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	8	2	0	0.67	16	1.000	43	14.33	66	.652	3.5	9.64
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	4	1	1	0.33	14	.929	45	15.00	57	.789	3.0	8.78
13	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	4	3	4	0.75	18	.778	59	14.75	85	.694	6.0	9.04
14	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	8	3	2	1.00	16	.875	38	12.67	62	.613	4.5	8.52
17	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	8	1	3	0.25	20	.850	57	14.25	86	.663	2.5	8.62
19	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	39	13.00	55	.709	2.0	9.54
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	5	2	3	0.67	13	.769	45	15.00	66	.682	5.5	10.00
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	8	.250	9	4	2	1.33	16	.875	40	13.33	54	.741	6.5	9.13
25	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	4	0	2	0.00	17	.882	64	12.80	99	.646	3.5	8.10
27	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	5	.800	8	2	0	0.50	18	1.000	49	12.25	67	.731	7.0	8.50
29	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	5	.200	5	2	2	0.40	18	.889	61	12.20	96	.635	4.0	6.78
32	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	42	14.00	60	.700	1.5	8.90
35	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	7	2	3	0.67	16	.813	39	13.00	61	.639	3.5	8.75
37	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	41	13.67	52	.788	3.0	8.19
40	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	57	14.25	84	.679	2.0	8.28
42	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	7	.000	7	4	1	0.80	21	.952	60	12.00	83	.723	7.0	6.94
44	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	6	3	2	1.00	15	.867	39	13.00	63	.619	5.5	8.48
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	9	3	1	1.00	18	.944	45	15.00	59	.763	3.5	8.87
47	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	5	.200	7	0	0	0.00	20	1.000	58	11.60	90	.644	2.5	7.02
Total		89	29	0.33	7	101	.218	144	41	43	0.46	386	.889	1196	13.44	1747	.685	99.5	8.68

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.36
2	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.42
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.66
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.25
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.82
8	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.35
10	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.64
11	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.78
13	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.04
14	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.52
17	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.62
19	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.54
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	10.00
23	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.13
25	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.10
27	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	8.50
29	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.78
32	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.90
35	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.75
37	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.19
40	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	1	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.28
42	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.94
44	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.48
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.87
47	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.02
Total		89	4	51	55	8	0.62	84	0.94	.	.	.	.	.	99.5	8.68