Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 23 hours and 33 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Tuesday, April 28th, 2026 - 06:26:50 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Christian Gentry 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	17	11	-

Season 12 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
198 90th	.583 18th	24 71st	25 329th	47 144th

Career Honors

S111st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	18	.611	14	4	0	1.00	23	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.28
2	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	8	21	.190	7	4	2	0.80	20	.900	.	.	.	.	20.5	9.39
3	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	12	4	2	1.33	19	.895	.	.	.	.	16.5	10.00
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.15
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	11	.273	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.49
11	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	8	21	.190	14	2	2	0.40	24	.917	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.18
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	9	1.000	3	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.31
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	18	.389	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.49
15	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	18	.389	14	1	2	0.25	25	.920	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.38
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	1	19	.842	6	3	0	0.75	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.45
19	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	8	.875	6	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.80
22	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	0	16	.875	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.38
26	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.59
29	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	18	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.86
34	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	11	.727	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
39	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	3	29	.759	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	27.0	7.07
44	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	0	15	1.000	2	2	3	0.67	10	.700	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.32
Total		63	198	3.14	43	266	.583	90	24	17	0.38	204	.917	.	.	.	.	247.0	6.86

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.28
2	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	9.39
3	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	10.00
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.15
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.49
11	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.18
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.31
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.49
15	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.38
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.45
19	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.80
22	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.38
26	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.59
29	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	2	3	5	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.86
34	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
39	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	27.0	7.07
44	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.32
Total		63	3	44	47	9	0.75	25	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	247.0	6.86