Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	26	8.67	69	.377	2.0	3.44
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	21	7.00	64	.328	1.5	2.66
8	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	7	.143	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	21	7.00	59	.356	1.0	2.52
11	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	23	7.67	56	.411	1.5	3.43
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	22	7.33	63	.349	3.0	2.95
17	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	24	8.00	62	.387	1.5	4.20
29	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	2	0	4	0.00	9	.556	33	11.00	63	.524	1.0	4.72
Total		21	6	0.29	1	28	.179	13	2	12	0.10	58	.793	170	8.10	436	.390	11.5	3.42

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.44
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.66
8	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.52
11	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.43
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.95
17	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.20
29	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.72
Total		21	1	5	6	2	0.29	16	0.76	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	3.42