Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	0	2	0.00	14	.857	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	10.00
5	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	3	0.75	17	.824	0	0.00	3	.000	3.0	7.42
8	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	5.75
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	5.61
14	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	5.98
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	7.36
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	8	2.00	11	.727	0.0	7.74
21	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	2	0.20	19	.895	1	0.20	7	.143	1.0	6.23
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	5.20
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	1	0.40	14	.929	7	1.40	14	.500	2.0	3.95
Total		36	.	.	.	.	.	46	7	10	0.19	109	.908	27	0.75	65	.415	7.0	6.52

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	7	2.50	10	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
5	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	8	2.05	21	2	.905	3.0	7.42
8	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.19	16	1	.938	0.0	5.75
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	2.53	17	0	1.000	0.0	5.61
14	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.33	9	1	.889	0.0	5.98
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	2	1.78	9	1	.889	1.0	7.36
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	8	2.40	15	1	.933	0.0	7.74
21	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	2.47	17	0	1.000	1.0	6.23
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.14	14	2	.857	0.0	5.20
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	19	2.15	39	2	.949	2.0	3.95
Total		36	.	.	.	.	.	80	2.22	90	2.25	167	10	.940	7.0	6.52