Players

Edu Portero 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	-	11	12	6	-

Season 12 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
183 108th	.352 169th	10 236th	20 354th	82 11th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	24	.542	3	0	4	0.00	16	.750	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.63
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	8	.375	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.56
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	14	.214	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.75
5	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	8	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.03
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	2	20	.700	4	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.04
8	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	6	15	-.067	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.79
10	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	5	1.000	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.60
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.37
13	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	12	.250	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.22
14	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	19	-.105	7	3	1	0.75	15	.933	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.71
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	17	.471	5	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.57
18	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	18	.389	4	1	4	0.20	16	.750	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.29
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.71
22	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	0	11	.545	3	2	3	0.40	12	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.26
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	8	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.5	9.44
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.46
29	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	19	.316	5	1	0	0.20	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.01
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	10	19	-.211	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.20
34	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	9	.222	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.56
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	11	.545	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.38
39	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	16	.438	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.42
40	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	21	.333	5	1	5	0.20	18	.722	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.45
44	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	16	.625	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.80
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	11	.545	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.28
Total		92	183	1.99	64	338	.352	100	10	52	0.11	303	.828	.	.	.	.	238.5	6.19

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.63
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.56
4	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.75
5	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.03
7	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.04
8	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	9	9	0	2.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.79
10	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.60
11	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.37
13	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.22
14	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.71
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.57
18	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.29
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.71
22	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.26
25	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	9.44
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.46
29	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.01
30	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.20
34	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.56
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	2	2	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.38
39	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.42
40	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.45
44	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.80
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.28
Total		92	9	73	82	5	0.89	20	0.22	.	.	.	.	.	238.5	6.19