Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	18	.056	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
5	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	14	.143	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.22
8	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	6	-.333	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.06
10	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	12	.167	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.30
14	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	20	.650	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.06
15	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	21	.524	4	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.91
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	8	.250	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.98
18	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	5	.400	8	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.30
29	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	11	.182	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.70
34	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	14	.214	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.38
Total		35	58	1.66	22	129	.279	36	3	25	0.09	111	.775	.	.	.	.	73.0	5.62

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
5	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.22
8	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.06
10	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.30
14	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.06
15	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.91
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.98
18	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.30
29	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.70
34	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.38
Total		35	2	20	22	3	0.63	36	1.03	.	.	.	.	.	73.0	5.62