Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	13	.231	4	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.62
8	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	2	18	.500	12	2	3	0.40	26	.885	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.39
11	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	25	.600	4	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.46
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	17	5.67	3	28	.500	6	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.90
18	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	17	.059	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.52
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	33	.303	7	1	4	0.25	18	.778	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.11
33	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	18	.556	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.92
35	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	15	.000	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.72
Total		28	86	3.07	24	167	.371	39	6	16	0.21	109	.853	.	.	.	.	104.5	7.46

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.62
8	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.39
11	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.46
15	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.90
18	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.52
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.11
33	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.92
35	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.72
Total		28	4	17	21	1	0.75	32	1.14	.	.	.	.	.	104.5	7.46