Players

Ike Cochran 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	14	10	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	13	-.154	9	2	1	0.50	17	.941	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.14
3	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	15	.400	4	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.57
5	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	6	.333	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.09
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	6	-.167	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.30
7	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	10	.300	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.27
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	11	-.182	5	1	4	0.33	13	.692	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.37
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	9	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.37
11	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	12	.417	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.23
15	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	16	.375	5	0	6	0.00	18	.667	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.34
17	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	8	.250	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.78
18	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.35
21	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	12	.167	9	1	3	0.20	23	.870	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.15
30	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	8	-.125	2	0	4	0.00	10	.600	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.39
35	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	7	.000	5	3	1	1.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.16
39	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	3	9	-.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	1.96
40	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.22
Total		61	59	0.97	32	155	.174	57	10	30	0.16	169	.822	.	.	.	.	101.0	4.86

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.14
3	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.57
5	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.09
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.30
7	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.27
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	2	6	8	0	2.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.37
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.37
11	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.23
15	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.34
17	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.78
18	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.35
21	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.15
30	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.39
35	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.16
39	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	1.96
40	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.22
Total		61	6	52	58	6	0.95	18	0.30	.	.	.	.	.	101.0	4.86