Players

Kevin Cooper 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	14	12	14	8	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	19	.368	12	3	1	0.75	21	.952	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.74
3	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	6	20	.150	8	1	2	0.33	17	.882	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.82
4	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	3	32	.469	13	2	2	0.40	25	.920	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.02
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	6	27	.296	3	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.20
9	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	26	.538	3	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.98
12	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	7	25	.160	8	0	3	0.00	21	.857	1	0.20	1	1.000	11.5	5.42
17	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	22	5.50	3	36	.528	7	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.87
22	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	5	29	.414	3	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.69
25	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	6	28	.357	6	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.63
30	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	24	.708	9	2	2	0.40	22	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	22.5	7.33
35	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	17	.235	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.60
40	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	7	12	-.167	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.12
44	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	0	16	.750	8	2	2	0.40	20	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	14.5	4.41
45	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	12	.417	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	1	0.25	1	1.000	8.5	3.07
Total		57	186	3.26	58	323	.396	86	14	21	0.25	222	.905	2	0.04	4	.500	218.5	6.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	9	9	0	2.25	8	2.00	10	2.05	22	3	.864	17.5	6.74
3	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	7	1.70	23	5	.783	12.0	5.82
4	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	15	2.00	36	5	.861	21.0	7.02
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	14	2.06	31	3	.903	16.0	7.20
9	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	9	1.77	30	5	.833	19.5	6.98
12	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	7	1.40	22	2.46	35	1	.971	11.5	5.42
17	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	14	2.35	26	1	.962	22.5	8.87
22	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	22	2.66	29	1	.966	19.0	8.69
25	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	12	1.90	30	5	.833	17.5	5.63
30	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	6	1.20	21	2.00	43	7	.837	22.5	7.33
35	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	19	2.30	30	2	.933	9.0	5.60
40	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	11	1.90	30	3	.900	7.5	3.12
44	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	.	.	20	2.14	36	4	.889	14.5	4.41
45	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	17	2.15	34	3	.912	8.5	3.07
Total		57	1	35	36	5	0.63	63	1.11	213	2.11	435	48	.890	218.5	6.14