Players

Ryan Palazzo 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	15	16	13	-

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
278 35th	.331 179th	20 105th	108 41st	67 62nd

Career Honors

S112nd All-BIG-8

S122nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	19	-.053	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.21
3	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	16	.125	15	1	5	0.20	24	.792	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.13
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	7	23	.174	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.06
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	6	32	.281	4	4	1	1.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.77
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	0	23	.609	7	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.99
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	24	.417	3	1	1	0.20	14	.929	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.31
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	7	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.91
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	21	.381	11	2	4	0.50	22	.818	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.95
13	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	24	6.00	0	28	.857	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	28.0	10.00
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	11	32	-.031	5	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.58
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	6	32	.219	4	1	3	0.20	14	.786	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.23
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	25	.520	5	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.42
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	23	.217	6	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.75
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	20	.250	7	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.75
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	21	.333	3	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.42
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	18	.167	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.55
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	7	2	4	0.67	14	.714	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.75
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	12	.167	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.58
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	19	.368	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.74
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	12	.667	2	2	3	0.50	12	.750	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.50
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	19	.158	1	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.19
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	14	.143	6	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.54
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	19	.526	8	0	1	0.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.35
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	12	.500	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.22
45	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	25	.360	3	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.50
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	2	28	.607	7	2	0	0.50	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.27
Total		102	278	2.73	98	543	.331	130	20	48	0.20	349	.862	.	.	.	.	334.0	6.60

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.21
3	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.13
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.06
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.77
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0	2	1	0.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.99
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.31
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.91
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.95
13	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	28.0	10.00
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.58
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.23
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.42
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.75
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	3	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.75
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.42
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.55
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.75
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.58
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.74
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.50
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.19
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.54
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.35
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.22
45	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.50
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.27
Total		102	5	62	67	8	0.66	108	1.06	.	.	.	.	.	334.0	6.60