Players

Danny Noonan 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	12	16	12	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	16	.750	7	2	4	0.50	17	.765	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	6.49
5	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	4	32	.500	2	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.40
7	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	19	.368	5	0	2	0.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.23
8	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.14
10	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	21	.667	9	2	1	0.50	18	.944	.	.	.	.	20.0	8.91
11	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	16	.563	4	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.82
13	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	8	.875	3	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.57
14	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	20	.700	11	2	4	0.50	23	.826	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.77
17	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	10	.900	7	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.18
19	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	16	.688	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.71
21	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	15	.733	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	14.5	9.41
22	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	18	.444	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	5.74
25	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	15	.800	9	2	1	0.67	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.59
26	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	9	3	3	1.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.20
31	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	11	.455	10	3	2	1.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.60
33	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	19	.579	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.83
34	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	22	.500	11	3	4	0.75	23	.826	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.13
36	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	3	27	.630	10	1	3	0.20	24	.875	.	.	.	.	23.0	7.74
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	16	.688	7	0	4	0.00	16	.750	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.03
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	5	1	1	0.33	13	.923	3	1.00	3	1.000	11.0	5.46
Total		70	244	3.49	34	336	.625	123	23	42	0.33	308	.864	3	0.04	5	.600	295.0	7.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.14	21	2	.905	15.0	6.49
5	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	19	2.22	37	3	.919	22.5	7.40
7	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	7	1.75	11	2.29	24	1	.958	14.5	7.23
8	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	6	2.00	14	2	.857	13.5	7.14
10	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	13	2.48	21	0	1.000	20.0	8.91
11	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	13	1.89	28	5	.821	14.0	4.82
13	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	12	2.35	20	1	.950	7.5	5.57
14	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	22	2.22	36	5	.861	18.0	7.77
17	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	7	2.00	16	2	.875	11.0	6.18
19	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	9	2.10	20	1	.950	14.5	7.71
21	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	6	2.00	7	2.64	11	0	1.000	14.5	9.41
22	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.09	22	3	.864	10.5	5.74
25	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	13	2.56	18	0	1.000	16.5	9.59
26	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	6	2.56	9	0	1.000	14.0	8.20
31	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	7	2.20	15	0	1.000	10.5	5.60
33	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	10	1.96	28	1	.964	12.5	5.83
34	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	17	2.12	34	4	.882	18.0	7.13
36	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	19	2.11	38	4	.895	23.0	7.74
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	11	2.59	17	0	1.000	14.0	9.03
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	5	1.86	14	3	.786	11.0	5.46
Total		70	3	50	53	1	0.76	72	1.03	229	2.19	443	37	.916	295.0	7.15