Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	7	.143	1	0	7	0.00	13	.462	53	13.25	112	.473	2.5	7.48
9	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	10	2	2	0.50	22	.909	50	12.50	111	.450	3.5	8.37
12	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	4	1	7	0.25	16	.563	36	9.00	81	.444	2.0	4.32
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	5	0	4	0.00	13	.692	34	11.33	60	.567	4.0	8.05
18	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	7	0	0	0.00	20	1.000	42	10.50	87	.483	0.5	5.39
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	33	11.00	68	.485	0.5	4.90
29	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	8	.500	4	0	6	0.00	16	.625	47	11.75	82	.573	6.0	7.42
34	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	5	1	3	0.33	13	.769	33	11.00	56	.589	3.5	6.70
Total		29	10	0.34	4	38	.158	38	4	31	0.14	124	.750	328	11.31	657	.499	22.5	6.58

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.48
9	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.37
12	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.32
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.05
18	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	5.39
21	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.90
29	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.42
34	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.70
Total		29	1	15	16	2	0.55	34	1.17	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	6.58