Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	7	.000	1	1	1	0.25	11	.909	30	7.50	87	.345	3.5	3.74
5	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	7	-.143	12	2	4	0.40	23	.826	41	8.20	100	.410	4.0	4.92
7	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	7	.286	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	20	6.67	63	.317	3.0	2.64
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	17	5.67	64	.266	2.5	2.62
15	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	24	8.00	66	.364	0.5	2.62
18	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	26	8.67	70	.371	0.5	3.74
21	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	40	13.33	77	.519	1.5	7.80
30	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	5	2	2	0.50	16	.875	51	12.75	82	.622	6.0	8.44
34	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	23	7.67	63	.365	2.0	3.62
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	8	4	2	1.00	18	.889	32	8.00	81	.395	8.0	5.06
Total		35	13	0.37	4	45	.200	40	11	20	0.31	123	.837	304	8.69	753	.404	31.5	4.52

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.74
5	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	13	2.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.92
7	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.64
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.62
15	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.62
18	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	3.74
21	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.80
30	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	8.44
34	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.62
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.06
Total		35	1	13	14	0	0.40	37	1.06	.	.	.	.	.	31.5	4.52