Players

Walter Kurtz 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	17	8	-

Season 13 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
210 78th	.551 34th	47 5th	18 373rd	63 71st

Career Honors

S121st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 13)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	10	.800	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.02
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.36
7	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	9	3	2	1.00	17	.882	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.39
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	13	.462	9	3	3	1.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.82
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	5	.600	9	3	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.07
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	4	2	2	0.67	13	.846	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	9	.667	7	2	2	0.50	18	.889	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.39
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	3	21	.619	4	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.04
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	11	.636	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.25
19	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	17	.294	15	5	2	1.00	29	.931	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.76
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	7	2	1	0.67	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.67
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	8	.750	4	3	2	1.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.10
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	12	.000	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.39
26	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	6	20	.400	5	3	1	0.75	15	.933	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.63
30	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	10	.600	0	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.80
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	9	1.000	11	4	4	1.33	19	.789	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.42
35	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	21	.571	14	3	2	0.60	27	.926	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.28
37	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	2	19	.684	10	5	1	1.67	21	.952	.	.	.	.	20.0	6.24
39	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	13	.846	3	0	5	0.00	17	.706	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.85
42	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	15	.333	12	2	5	0.67	22	.773	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.61
45	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	14	.357	2	1	4	0.33	10	.600	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.80
47	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	6	22	.409	9	4	1	0.80	21	.952	.	.	.	.	21.5	8.48
Total		78	210	2.69	53	285	.551	149	47	43	0.60	357	.880	.	.	.	.	290.5	7.26

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 13)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.02
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.36
7	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.39
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.82
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.07
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	2	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.39
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.04
18	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.25
19	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.76
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.67
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.10
25	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.39
26	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.63
30	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.80
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.42
35	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	9.28
37	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	6.24
39	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	1	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.85
42	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.61
45	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.80
47	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	3	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	8.48
Total		78	4	59	63	8	0.81	18	0.23	.	.	.	.	.	290.5	7.26