Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	6.43
5	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	5.93
8	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	4.15
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	2.35
13	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	.333	0.0	4.05
15	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	3.70
18	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	5.05
29	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	.385	0.0	2.30
34	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.85
36	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	15	.533	0.0	5.11
Total		33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	25	0.76	69	.362	0.0	4.39

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	2.20	20	2	.900	0.0	6.43
5	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	13	2.15	27	2	.926	0.0	5.93
8	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.00	28	1	.964	0.0	4.15
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	1.90	29	5	.828	0.0	2.35
13	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	2.06	17	0	1.000	0.0	4.05
15	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.27	26	2	.923	0.0	3.70
18	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.04	23	3	.870	0.0	5.05
29	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	1.81	21	3	.857	0.0	2.30
34	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.19	21	3	.857	0.0	4.85
36	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	18	1.89	38	6	.842	0.0	5.11
Total		33	.	.	.	.	.	50	1.52	115	2.04	250	27	.892	0.0	4.39