Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	5.75
4	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	15	.800	0.0	5.13
6	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	5	.600	0.0	7.71
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	5.88
15	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	.500	0.0	6.35
26	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	6.98
31	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	3.20
Total		25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	31	1.24	48	.646	0.0	5.86

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.25	16	1	.938	0.0	5.75
4	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	16	1.97	33	6	.818	0.0	5.13
6	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	23	2.25	40	3	.925	0.0	7.71
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.00	27	4	.852	0.0	5.88
15	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	17	2.09	33	5	.848	0.0	6.35
26	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.22	23	1	.957	0.0	6.98
31	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	10	1.89	27	4	.852	0.0	3.20
Total		25	.	.	.	.	.	58	2.32	97	2.09	199	24	.879	0.0	5.86