Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	6	.333	14	1	3	0.25	24	.875	51	12.75	86	.593	4.5	9.66
3	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	7	.000	5	2	2	0.67	14	.857	35	11.67	65	.538	4.5	8.18
4	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	7	.000	6	0	3	0.00	20	.850	60	12.00	104	.577	1.5	6.80
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	9	1	2	0.33	18	.889	35	11.67	67	.522	2.5	7.15
9	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	14	4	4	1.00	25	.840	53	13.25	93	.570	6.5	9.68
10	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	7	.143	8	1	1	0.25	20	.950	50	12.50	96	.521	4.0	8.30
11	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	6	.500	7	1	1	0.20	20	.950	51	10.20	98	.520	4.5	5.94
12	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	4	.500	8	5	2	1.00	22	.909	57	11.40	100	.570	9.5	7.36
17	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	11	2	1	0.50	22	.955	52	13.00	98	.531	3.0	7.94
22	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	10	.000	7	1	1	0.25	19	.947	57	14.25	90	.633	4.0	9.89
30	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	8	.500	3	0	3	0.00	18	.833	68	13.60	104	.654	5.5	8.34
33	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	7	3	3	0.60	21	.857	59	11.80	97	.608	4.5	6.82
34	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	8	.000	11	2	2	0.40	23	.913	55	11.00	92	.598	5.5	6.67
40	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	9	2	2	0.67	18	.889	36	12.00	69	.522	5.0	7.71
44	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	7	.143	5	0	3	0.00	20	.850	58	11.60	90	.644	2.5	7.02
45	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	6	2	3	0.50	18	.833	49	12.25	101	.485	2.0	6.50
Total		68	24	0.35	7	86	.198	130	27	36	0.40	322	.888	826	12.15	1450	.570	69.5	7.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.66
3	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.18
4	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.80
8	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.15
9	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.68
10	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.30
11	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	5.94
12	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.36
17	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.94
22	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.89
30	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.34
33	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.82
34	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.67
40	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.71
44	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.02
45	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.50
Total		68	3	31	34	3	0.50	69	1.01	.	.	.	.	.	69.5	7.75