Players

Cole Slaughter 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	16	16	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	13	.231	7	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.51
3	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.36
5	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.17
6	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.53
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	11	.182	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.20
9	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	6	.333	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.85
10	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.54
12	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	13	.692	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.28
13	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	15	.400	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.55
14	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	0	18	.833	2	1	1	0.20	11	.909	.	.	.	.	16.0	4.54
16	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	13	.385	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.91
17	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	0	15	.867	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.64
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	5	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.74
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	18	.167	7	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.41
25	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	14	.429	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.87
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
31	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	11	.636	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.78
36	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	13	.462	2	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.63
41	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.46
44	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	13	.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.11
46	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	23	.435	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	4.72
Total		80	172	2.15	53	259	.459	63	4	27	0.05	183	.852	.	.	.	.	212.0	6.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.51
3	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.36
5	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	8.17
6	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.53
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	2	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.20
9	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.85
10	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.54
12	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	2	3	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.28
13	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.55
14	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	4.54
16	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.91
17	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.64
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.74
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	2	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.41
25	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.87
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
31	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.78
36	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.63
41	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.46
44	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.11
46	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	4.72
Total		80	6	60	66	9	0.83	18	0.23	.	.	.	.	.	212.0	6.15