Players

Cole Slaughter 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	16	16	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	7	.857	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
3	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	7	21	.190	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.12
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	10	-.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
6	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	19	.421	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.06
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	9	-.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	14	.643	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.29
10	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	19	.263	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
12	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	24	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	4.89
13	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.56
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.36
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	18	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.12
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	14	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.53
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	12	.667	5	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.74
25	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	11	.818	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.88
29	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	18	.278	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.00
31	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	8	.500	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.63
36	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	12	.167	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.00
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	12	.500	9	4	1	1.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.00
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	18	.500	2	1	0	0.20	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.36
Total		72	174	2.42	57	261	.448	27	7	6	0.10	79	.924	.	.	.	.	213.0	5.93

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
3	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	1	6	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.12
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
6	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.06
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.29
10	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	2	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.50
12	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	4.89
13	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.56
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.36
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.12
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.53
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.74
25	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	2	2.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.88
29	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.00
31	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.63
36	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.00
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.00
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.36
Total		72	4	56	60	8	0.83	4	0.06	.	.	.	.	.	213.0	5.93