Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	28	9.33	74	.378	1.0	4.23
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	4	1	4	0.33	10	.600	18	6.00	55	.327	1.0	1.64
15	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	27	9.00	66	.409	2.5	4.51
17	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	23	7.67	68	.338	1.0	3.18
18	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	7	4	3	0.80	20	.850	38	7.60	93	.409	6.0	3.86
21	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	22	7.33	62	.355	2.5	2.38
23	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	4	0.00	8	.500	17	5.67	54	.315	0.0	1.00
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	16	5.33	52	.308	0.0	1.00
Total		26	3	0.12	2	14	.071	23	7	18	0.27	86	.791	189	7.27	524	.361	14.0	2.73

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.23
14	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.64
15	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.51
17	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.18
18	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.86
21	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.38
23	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.00
32	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.00
Total		26	2	4	6	0	0.23	11	0.42	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	2.73