Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 11 hours and 53 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 06:06:54 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Santiago Catanzaro 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	15	17	13	8

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
175 124th	.286 218th	8 274th	59 206th	28 276th

Career Honors

S142nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	21	.143	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.5	1.88
5	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	9	25	.000	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.67
10	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	18	6.00	4	29	.483	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.11
14	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	28	.214	2	1	4	0.25	12	.667	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.93
15	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	7	35	.200	11	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.87
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	21	.000	3	2	2	0.67	9	.778	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.97
18	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	7	39	.231	7	1	3	0.25	16	.813	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.15
21	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	15	.733	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.5	6.39
25	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	25	.400	6	0	5	0.00	16	.688	0	0.00	2	.000	15.5	5.60
26	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	17	.294	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	2	0.67	2	1.000	8.0	4.27
29	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	10	46	.261	6	2	1	0.40	14	.929	.	.	.	.	24.5	7.08
34	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	20	.550	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.07
36	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	10	.200	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.15
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	16	.375	3	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.5	2.91
46	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	17	.471	7	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.64
Total		53	175	3.30	71	364	.286	56	8	32	0.15	174	.816	4	0.08	6	.667	197.0	5.31

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	9	1.70	27	6	.778	6.5	1.88
5	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	7	1.81	21	4	.810	9.5	4.67
10	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	11	1.82	33	5	.848	19.0	7.11
14	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	10	1.85	27	3	.889	13.5	4.93
15	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	9	2.25	12	2.14	21	3	.857	16.5	7.87
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	7	1.52	23	6	.739	11.0	3.97
18	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	14	1.88	33	8	.758	18.5	7.15
21	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	12	2.21	24	1	.958	14.5	6.39
25	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	8	1.73	33	4	.879	15.5	5.60
26	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	10	1.92	25	5	.800	8.0	4.27
29	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	11	2.04	25	1	.960	24.5	7.08
34	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	13	2.10	29	4	.862	14.5	7.07
36	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	1.79	24	5	.792	4.0	2.15
44	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	9	1.68	31	5	.839	9.5	2.91
46	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	1.91	22	3	.864	12.0	6.64
Total		53	0	28	28	3	0.53	59	1.11	151	1.87	398	63	.842	197.0	5.31