Players

Santiago Catanzaro 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	15	17	13	8

Career Honors

S142nd All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	22	.364	0	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.79
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	5	36	.583	11	1	4	0.20	23	.826	0	0.00	1	.000	28.0	7.98
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	18	.611	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	2	0.67	2	1.000	14.0	6.51
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	1	26	.615	3	0	4	0.00	13	.692	1	0.20	1	1.000	18.5	6.86
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	19	.579	2	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.47
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	15	.600	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.90
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	23	.348	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.0	6.76
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	24	4.80	3	35	.600	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	26.0	6.92
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	23	5.75	6	34	.500	3	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	24.5	8.25
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	2	33	.606	5	2	2	0.40	17	.882	.	.	.	.	26.0	7.83
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	21	.476	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.79
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	31	.452	4	1	4	0.25	13	.692	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.37
30	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	22	.455	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.08
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	19	.632	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.39
35	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	0	20	.850	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	20.0	8.68
38	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	5	29	.586	3	1	3	0.20	13	.769	.	.	.	.	25.5	7.21
44	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	4	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	5.96
45	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.90
Total		69	289	4.19	54	424	.554	60	11	34	0.16	208	.837	6	0.09	8	.750	333.0	7.20

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	15	2.23	26	2	.923	13.5	6.79
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	9	1.80	10	1.94	32	1	.969	28.0	7.98
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	2.08	25	2	.920	14.0	6.51
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	27	2.51	41	0	1.000	18.5	6.86
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	12	2.53	17	1	.941	15.0	8.47
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	16	2.19	26	4	.846	13.0	6.90
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	24	2.44	39	1	.974	15.0	6.76
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	15	1.97	37	3	.919	26.0	6.92
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	17	2.30	27	2	.926	24.5	8.25
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	19	2.21	38	4	.895	26.0	7.83
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	15	2.13	30	3	.900	15.5	7.79
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	8	1.84	31	2	.935	22.0	7.37
30	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	5	1.00	13	1.89	27	5	.815	17.0	5.08
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	14	2.52	21	0	1.000	15.5	8.39
35	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	9	2.22	18	1	.944	20.0	8.68
38	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	4	0.80	12	2.06	34	1	.971	25.5	7.21
44	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	3	2.00	10	0	1.000	12.5	5.96
45	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	3	1.00	13	2.08	26	3	.885	11.5	5.90
Total		69	3	60	63	3	0.91	50	0.72	253	2.17	505	35	.931	333.0	7.20