Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	8	.250	13	4	3	1.00	25	.880	37	9.25	104	.356	7.5	5.82
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	16	5.33	59	.271	2.0	2.18
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	4	2	2	0.67	12	.833	26	8.67	60	.433	10.0	5.79
12	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	23	7.67	59	.390	2.5	3.78
15	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	9	1	1	0.20	23	.957	48	9.60	106	.453	5.5	6.13
17	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	3	11	-.091	4	0	3	0.00	16	.813	50	10.00	95	.526	4.0	5.65
21	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	9	.333	9	2	4	0.40	23	.826	57	11.40	109	.523	7.0	7.47
26	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	2	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	35	8.75	66	.530	2.5	4.52
30	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	32	10.67	70	.457	2.5	5.44
35	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	21	7.00	63	.333	1.5	2.75
40	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	21	7.00	62	.339	0.5	2.22
Total		41	19	0.46	7	55	.218	48	10	21	0.24	156	.865	366	8.93	853	.429	45.5	4.70

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.82
6	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	2.18
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.79
12	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.78
15	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.13
17	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.65
21	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.47
26	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.52
30	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.44
35	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.75
40	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.22
Total		41	3	27	30	2	0.73	39	0.95	.	.	.	.	.	45.5	4.70