Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	3	-.667	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	40	13.33	65	.615	2.0	8.66
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	5	2	2	0.67	12	.833	27	9.00	64	.422	2.0	3.76
4	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	22	4	3	1.33	28	.893	28	9.33	47	.596	4.0	5.55
5	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	39	13.00	74	.527	2.5	8.08
7	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	7	2	1	0.50	19	.947	57	14.25	93	.613	5.0	9.66
8	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	31	10.33	60	.517	2.0	6.51
10	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	3	.000	9	2	1	0.40	23	.957	52	10.40	97	.536	3.5	5.91
11	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	12	3	4	0.60	25	.840	48	9.60	101	.475	6.0	5.64
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	35	11.67	64	.547	2.5	6.42
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	11	0	2	0.00	19	.895	34	11.33	59	.576	5.0	8.34
18	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	6	.167	4	1	4	0.25	17	.765	63	15.75	94	.670	3.5	8.30
19	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	2	1	1	0.33	11	.909	36	12.00	59	.610	4.0	7.68
29	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	31	10.33	61	.508	3.0	6.65
36	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	9	.222	14	6	0	1.20	27	1.000	54	10.80	99	.545	9.0	6.46
39	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	38	12.67	68	.559	0.0	7.44
Total		53	17	0.32	9	62	.129	107	21	26	0.40	251	.896	613	11.57	1105	.555	54.0	7.00

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.66
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.76
4	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.55
5	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.08
7	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.66
8	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.51
10	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.91
11	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.64
13	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.42
14	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.34
18	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.30
19	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	2	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.68
29	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.65
36	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.46
39	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	7.44
Total		53	1	30	31	4	0.58	60	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	54.0	7.00