Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	36	12.00	51	.706	4.0	8.24
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	6	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	33	11.00	62	.532	3.5	5.84
7	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	40	13.33	56	.714	9.0	9.68
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	17	4	1	1.33	21	.952	34	11.33	54	.630	6.5	8.33
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	8	.625	9	1	3	0.33	15	.800	36	12.00	60	.600	7.5	8.87
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	3	1	1	0.25	12	.917	48	12.00	81	.593	2.5	6.84
19	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	5	.200	6	1	2	0.20	16	.875	57	11.40	97	.588	3.0	6.52
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	7	2	3	0.67	15	.800	36	12.00	53	.679	3.0	7.79
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	11	5	0	1.67	17	1.000	38	12.67	55	.691	7.0	9.38
35	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	10	.400	9	2	2	0.40	21	.905	52	10.40	93	.559	11.0	7.60
37	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	5	1	1	0.33	14	.929	44	14.67	69	.638	3.0	9.19
39	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	10	.200	4	1	3	0.20	15	.800	61	12.20	92	.663	6.0	7.16
42	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	44	14.67	70	.629	2.0	9.31
45	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	32	10.67	57	.561	2.5	4.90
47	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	7	.571	10	1	1	0.20	21	.952	49	9.80	84	.583	7.5	6.56
Total		54	33	0.61	7	82	.317	102	23	21	0.43	221	.905	640	11.85	1034	.619	78.0	7.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.24
5	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.84
7	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	9.68
11	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.33
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	8.87
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.84
19	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.52
22	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.79
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	9.38
35	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.60
37	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.19
39	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.16
42	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.31
45	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.90
47	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.56
Total		54	3	38	41	4	0.76	58	1.07	.	.	.	.	.	78.0	7.75