Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	8	.375	8	0	4	0.00	21	.810	57	11.40	106	.538	4.0	6.76
2	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	6	.333	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	35	11.67	68	.515	4.0	7.63
3	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	10	2	4	0.40	23	.826	60	12.00	112	.536	4.0	7.22
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	6	.333	10	1	3	0.33	17	.824	34	11.33	54	.630	4.0	7.62
16	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	10	1	1	0.33	18	.944	49	16.33	71	.690	1.5	8.78
20	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	5	1	4	0.20	19	.789	66	13.20	94	.702	3.5	7.50
24	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	6	.167	8	0	2	0.00	22	.909	63	12.60	106	.594	3.5	8.52
28	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	1	3	0.33	10	.700	34	11.33	60	.567	2.0	5.40
30	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	3	1	3	0.33	13	.769	49	16.33	75	.653	3.5	8.48
32	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	7	.571	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	46	15.33	66	.697	5.0	9.15
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	3	0	3	0.00	15	.800	51	12.75	74	.689	4.0	7.76
37	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	39	13.00	64	.609	2.0	7.96
40	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	8	.625	5	0	1	0.00	18	.944	54	13.50	86	.628	5.0	8.72
44	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	40	13.33	58	.690	5.5	9.29
45	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	1	4	0.20	20	.800	56	11.20	99	.566	1.5	5.30
Total		57	33	0.58	6	79	.342	78	8	40	0.14	239	.833	733	12.86	1193	.614	53.0	7.74

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.76
2	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.63
3	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.22
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.62
16	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.78
20	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.50
24	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.52
28	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.40
30	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.48
32	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.15
35	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.76
37	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.96
40	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.72
44	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	1	2.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.29
45	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.30
Total		57	1	22	23	3	0.40	44	0.77	.	.	.	.	.	53.0	7.74