Players

Eithan Hurst 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	13	12	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	11	.364	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.37
3	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	18	.167	6	1	4	0.20	16	.750	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.69
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	14	2	1	0.67	21	.952	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.69
7	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	7	20	-.050	8	1	4	0.20	19	.789	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.04
9	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	13	.615	9	1	1	0.25	21	.952	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.72
10	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	19	.263	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.71
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	4	4	-1.000	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.13
14	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.49
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	6	8	-.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
19	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	19	.368	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.67
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.88
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	7	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
26	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	20	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.98
27	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.14
30	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	17	.059	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.53
31	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
36	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	16	.063	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
37	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	6	26	.192	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.36
Total		66	114	1.73	60	244	.221	44	7	13	0.11	99	.869	.	.	.	.	163.5	5.67

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.37
3	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.69
5	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.69
7	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.04
9	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.72
10	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.71
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	10	11	1	3.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.13
14	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	2	6	8	0	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.49
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
19	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	1	12	13	2	3.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.67
22	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.88
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
26	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.98
27	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.14
30	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	2	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	2.53
31	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.70
36	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.06
37	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	2	6	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.36
Total		66	7	71	78	11	1.18	9	0.14	.	.	.	.	.	163.5	5.67