Players

Gonzalo Delgado 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	13	14	12	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	12	5	3	1.67	17	.824	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.12
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	6	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.20
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	18	.556	10	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.50
9	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	2	27	.556	2	2	0	0.40	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	21.0	7.80
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	19	.579	3	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.71
12	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	21	.381	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.83
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	16	.563	12	3	3	1.00	20	.850	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.76
16	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	8	37	.351	9	1	1	0.20	22	.955	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.23
19	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	24	4.80	2	35	.629	8	1	2	0.20	18	.889	.	.	.	.	26.5	8.90
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	22	5.50	6	37	.432	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.14
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	17	.118	11	1	3	0.25	23	.870	1	0.25	2	.500	10.0	4.93
23	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	2	25	.640	3	1	0	0.20	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.59
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	24	.333	0	0	1	0.00	14	.929	0	0.00	2	.000	13.0	3.82
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	18	.389	10	2	2	0.67	19	.895	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.42
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	25	.400	10	1	0	0.25	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.42
32	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	2	28	.643	6	3	3	0.75	17	.824	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.46
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	16	.313	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.97
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	24	.583	3	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.65
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	21	5.25	5	32	.500	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	22.5	7.15
40	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	6	31	.355	3	1	1	0.25	11	.909	1	0.25	1	1.000	20.5	8.76
Total		77	289	3.75	65	476	.471	123	27	30	0.35	308	.903	2	0.03	5	.400	342.0	7.42

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	8	2.50	14	0	1.000	17.0	8.12
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	8	2.38	13	0	1.000	9.5	6.20
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	2	1.86	7	0	1.000	14.0	7.50
9	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	7	1.40	22	2.84	25	0	1.000	21.0	7.80
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	8	2.43	14	0	1.000	16.0	8.71
12	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	9	2.25	10	2.28	18	1	.944	13.0	6.83
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	2.62	13	0	1.000	14.5	8.76
16	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	11	2.20	17	2.27	30	1	.967	22.5	8.23
19	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	12	2.53	19	0	1.000	26.5	8.90
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	10	2.33	24	0	1.000	23.0	8.14
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	11	2.30	20	0	1.000	10.0	4.93
23	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	8	2.46	13	0	1.000	20.5	7.59
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	6	1.82	17	2	.882	13.0	3.82
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	6	2.45	11	0	1.000	11.5	7.42
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	16	2.59	22	1	.955	16.5	8.42
32	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	10	2.60	15	0	1.000	23.0	8.46
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	2	2.14	7	0	1.000	10.5	5.97
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	1.94	16	2	.875	17.0	6.65
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	8	2.05	19	1	.947	22.5	7.15
40	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	16	2.54	24	0	1.000	20.5	8.76
Total		77	2	48	50	4	0.65	92	1.19	196	2.37	341	8	.977	342.0	7.42