Players

Career Honors

S131st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	3	1.00	3	1.000	1.0	6.10
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.20	20	.950	7	1.40	15	.467	1.0	6.70
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	8.94
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	3	1	0.60	25	.960	1	0.20	11	.091	3.0	8.96
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	0	0.67	15	1.000	3	1.00	4	.750	2.0	7.91
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	3.85
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	3.90
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	.600	0.0	3.65
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	5	0.50	20	.750	2	0.50	5	.400	2.0	6.55
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	14	.929	5	1.00	7	.714	0.0	5.55
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	3.78
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	2	0.50	16	.875	6	1.50	10	.600	2.0	8.59
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	5.90
35	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	14	.786	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	8.49
38	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	3	0	0.60	19	1.000	10	2.00	12	.833	3.0	7.74
44	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	1	1	0.33	17	.941	4	1.33	6	.667	1.0	8.04
45	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	3	0	1.00	13	1.000	5	1.67	9	.556	3.0	8.46
Total		64	.	.	.	.	.	91	20	17	0.31	225	.924	70	1.09	119	.588	20.0	6.65

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	6	2.09	11	1	.909	1.0	6.10
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	10	2.30	20	0	1.000	1.0	6.70
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.47	19	0	1.000	0.0	8.94
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	16	2.71	21	0	1.000	3.0	8.96
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	3	2.38	8	0	1.000	2.0	7.91
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	2.13	16	1	.938	1.0	3.85
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	16	2.32	25	2	.920	0.0	3.90
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	8	2.00	20	2	.900	0.0	3.65
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	14	2.43	21	1	.952	2.0	6.55
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	2.38	21	0	1.000	0.0	5.55
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	2.08	13	1	.923	0.0	3.78
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	6	2.25	12	0	1.000	2.0	8.59
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.21	14	1	.929	1.0	5.90
35	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	5	2.08	13	1	.923	0.0	8.49
38	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	14	2.50	22	0	1.000	3.0	7.74
44	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	2.36	11	1	.909	1.0	8.04
45	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	4	2.38	8	0	1.000	3.0	8.46
Total		64	.	.	.	.	.	128	2.00	153	2.32	275	11	.960	20.0	6.65