Players

Mathis Legrand 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	15	5	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	16	.563	8	4	2	0.80	19	.895	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.71
2	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	16	.625	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.73
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	13	.923	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.89
4	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	12	.500	3	2	2	0.67	9	.778	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.02
9	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.40
11	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	19	.316	10	2	1	0.50	20	.950	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.15
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	12	.250	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.83
15	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	10	1	6	0.33	19	.684	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.47
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	7	.286	7	1	1	0.33	16	.938	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.60
17	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	17	.294	7	1	3	0.25	19	.842	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.09
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	16	.313	4	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.17
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.40
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	13	-.077	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.33
27	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	11	.091	4	1	0	0.25	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.81
31	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	7	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.25
36	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	18	.222	8	1	1	0.20	17	.941	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.91
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	12	.083	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
41	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	0	8	.875	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.98
Total		62	137	2.21	46	231	.394	88	16	23	0.26	218	.894	.	.	.	.	180.5	6.56

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	2	3	5	2	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.71
2	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	2	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.73
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.89
4	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.02
9	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.40
11	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.15
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.83
15	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.47
16	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.60
17	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.09
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.17
21	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.40
22	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.33
27	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.81
31	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.25
36	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.91
39	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
41	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.98
Total		62	3	49	52	9	0.84	11	0.18	.	.	.	.	.	180.5	6.56