Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	7.75
2	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	3	.667	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	3.05
3	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	6.58
Total		9	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	6	0.00	21	.714	7	0.78	20	.350	0.0	5.79

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	5	1.89	19	1	.947	0.0	7.75
2	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	1.96	27	1	.963	0.0	3.05
3	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	10	2.19	21	1	.952	0.0	6.58
Total		9	.	.	.	.	.	24	2.67	22	2.01	67	3	.955	0.0	5.79