Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	41	13.67	71	.577	3.5	9.57
6	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	9	2	5	0.40	23	.783	62	12.40	115	.539	4.5	8.11
7	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	31	10.33	66	.470	2.5	5.67
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	6	.000	8	0	1	0.00	17	.941	27	9.00	64	.422	2.0	4.70
15	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	21	5	3	1.25	31	.903	39	9.75	79	.494	8.5	6.05
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	8	0	2	0.00	19	.895	43	10.75	92	.467	1.5	5.92
22	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	32	10.67	55	.582	4.0	5.32
26	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	31	10.33	64	.484	2.0	4.76
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	22	7.33	61	.361	0.0	1.96
41	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	7	1	2	0.25	18	.889	52	13.00	82	.634	3.5	9.31
Total		35	15	0.43	3	38	.316	65	9	21	0.26	161	.870	380	10.86	749	.507	32.0	6.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.57
6	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.11
7	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.67
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.70
15	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.05
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.92
22	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.32
26	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.76
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.96
41	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.31
Total		35	3	10	13	5	0.37	38	1.09	.	.	.	.	.	32.0	6.14