Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	4	.000	8	5	1	1.00	22	.955	67	13.40	112	.598	5.5	8.10
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	23	7.67	63	.365	1.0	2.80
9	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	2	.000	13	2	1	0.40	26	.962	56	11.20	91	.615	3.5	6.86
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	5	3	2	1.00	12	.833	24	8.00	64	.375	6.0	3.86
15	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	39	13.00	69	.565	1.5	8.20
16	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	2	1	2	0.33	9	.778	20	6.67	59	.339	4.0	3.67
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	10	2	2	0.50	21	.905	41	10.25	90	.456	4.0	6.33
29	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	33	11.00	62	.532	2.5	5.18
Total		29	10	0.34	4	28	.214	48	14	12	0.48	125	.904	303	10.45	610	.497	28.0	5.63

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.10
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.80
9	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.86
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.86
15	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.20
16	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.67
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.33
29	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.18
Total		29	0	8	8	1	0.28	25	0.86	.	.	.	.	.	28.0	5.63