Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	3	1.00	10	.300	0.0	7.23
4	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	4	1.33	5	.800	1.0	4.01
8	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.65
11	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	5	.800	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	2.05
14	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	3.20
15	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	2	0.67	9	.778	4	1.33	7	.571	2.0	6.86
17	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.25	5	.200	0.0	3.95
18	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	5	.000	1.0	4.97
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	6	1.20	8	.750	0.0	5.70
29	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	4	0.25	13	.692	1	0.25	3	.333	1.0	3.60
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	32	6	18	0.18	92	.804	26	0.76	59	.441	6.0	4.72

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	18	6.00	6	1.71	17	3	.824	0.0	7.23
4	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.27	15	1	.933	1.0	4.01
8	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	19	2.15	33	4	.879	0.0	5.65
11	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	1.64	25	5	.800	1.0	2.05
14	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.04	27	3	.889	0.0	3.20
15	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.33	21	0	1.000	2.0	6.86
17	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	2.00	22	4	.818	0.0	3.95
18	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	16	2.24	29	3	.897	1.0	4.97
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	18	2.06	35	4	.886	0.0	5.70
29	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	13	2.23	31	1	.968	1.0	3.60
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	53	1.56	120	2.07	255	28	.890	6.0	4.72