Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	11	.000	0.0	5.85
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	2.95
8	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	17	.941	1	0.20	3	.333	0.0	4.81
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	1	0.50	13	.923	6	1.50	12	.500	2.0	5.86
15	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.20	14	.929	13	2.60	23	.565	1.0	6.78
18	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	2	0.67	4	.500	1.0	4.72
21	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	3	1	0.60	16	.938	4	0.80	9	.444	3.0	5.65
29	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	5.40
34	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	3.50
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.38
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	40	7	9	0.18	110	.918	33	0.87	76	.434	7.0	4.89

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	2.21	24	0	1.000	0.0	5.85
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	1.95	20	5	.750	0.0	2.95
8	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	13	2.33	24	0	1.000	0.0	4.81
10	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	2.20	20	1	.950	2.0	5.86
15	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	12	2.30	23	1	.957	1.0	6.78
18	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.00	16	2	.875	1.0	4.72
21	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	11	2.08	26	3	.885	3.0	5.65
29	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.26	23	2	.913	0.0	5.40
34	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	2.27	11	0	1.000	0.0	3.50
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	2.00	15	2	.867	0.0	3.38
Total		38	.	.	.	.	.	54	1.42	99	2.17	202	16	.921	7.0	4.89