Players

Abdiel Serrano 6 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	13	13	16	13	3

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	18	.389	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.89
2	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	25	.520	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.31
4	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	25	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.59
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	21	.619	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.44
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	7	37	.432	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	25.0	7.88
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	17	.529	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.74
8	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	4	26	.462	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.30
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	27	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	4.68
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	22	.409	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.56
14	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	15	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.58
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	12	-.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.28
19	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.68
20	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	17	.471	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.49
25	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	16	.563	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.52
26	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.57
29	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.52
30	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.52
33	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	16	.563	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.25
34	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	28	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.05
Total		65	208	3.20	64	370	.389	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	242.5	6.36

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	NA	NA	25	1	.960	11.5	6.89
2	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	NA	NA	19	0	1.000	18.0	8.31
4	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	NA	NA	30	3	.900	19.0	7.59
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	10	2.50	NA	NA	25	3	.880	15.5	6.44
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	9	1.80	NA	NA	16	1	.938	25.0	7.88
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	NA	NA	19	1	.947	15.5	8.74
8	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	22	2	.909	16.5	8.30
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	11	2.20	NA	NA	27	4	.852	15.5	4.68
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	18	1	.944	13.0	7.56
14	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	NA	NA	24	3	.875	6.5	2.58
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	9	3.00	NA	NA	25	2	.920	6.0	5.28
19	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	12	4.00	NA	NA	18	2	.889	8.0	4.68
20	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	NA	NA	25	1	.960	10.0	6.49
25	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	11	3.67	NA	NA	9	1	.889	11.0	6.52
26	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	NA	NA	16	2	.875	7.0	3.57
29	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	NA	NA	20	2	.900	8.0	5.52
30	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	NA	NA	16	1	.938	8.0	6.52
33	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	NA	NA	20	0	1.000	14.0	8.25
34	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	NA	NA	34	5	.853	14.5	5.05
Total		65	1	31	32	2	0.49	130	2.00	0	0.00	408	35	.914	242.5	6.36