Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	25	.240	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.08
2	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	10	.100	8	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.72
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	4	-.250	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.41
5	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	13	.615	8	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.71
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	8	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.54
8	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	16	.188	7	1	4	0.20	16	.750	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.78
10	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	8	.000	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.06
11	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	12	.583	5	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.66
13	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	21	.333	1	1	3	0.20	12	.750	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.72
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	19	.474	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.76
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.12
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	18	.500	6	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.26
22	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	17	.353	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.26
25	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	24	.417	8	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.55
26	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	34	.353	4	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.72
29	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	8	30	.167	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.30
36	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	19	.579	15	1	4	0.25	24	.833	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.67
44	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.75
46	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	16	.375	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.46
Total		70	167	2.39	51	315	.368	91	10	27	0.14	239	.887	.	.	.	.	202.0	6.55

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.08
2	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.72
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.41
5	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.71
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	7.54
8	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.78
10	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.06
11	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.66
13	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.72
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.76
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.12
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.26
22	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.26
25	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.55
26	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.72
29	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.30
36	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.67
44	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	2	3	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.75
46	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.46
Total		70	6	38	44	2	0.63	82	1.17	.	.	.	.	.	202.0	6.55